who is born a Catholic and never becomes Christian is an enemy of the human race as they do not know the epicheia of Jesus can only be an enemy of himself and then everyone just believed if "taxpayers", that is if everyone pays taxes. The Roman Catholic
ever becomes a Christian by 'assuming that the "taxpayers" have to pay taxes, without even asking the question why they exist and what they really are. Is this the effect of being a practicing Catholic: spiritual automatism that is no different than the fair iniquity? Epicheia means fairness. Inequity is the opposite of fairness. Jesus was epic and capable of truth, because it is free, not slaves. Those born Roman Catholic but has never become a Christian fantozzianamente mild, and its maximum capacity is to be taken for granted that the income tax for a long time there, as has always known only one, and it becomes obvious: in other words, truth . So the truth shall make you free, and make believers lie? Apparently, yes.
taxes and fees are money, money from citizens through the sweaty work. And that money from 'the community itself, represented by the legal person "status" in order to sustain public expenditure.
This concept, in itself, is not negative but rather a sign of solidarity, community, of unity. Everyone does (or so it should) the community in addressing the costs that all Jupiter (or so it should), as collective units. The problem then is not the tax itself, but its necessity. In other words, it is necessary to deprive us of money to give to the community?
This we can understand only if you understand what the money is. And only when we understand that money is a public institution, and therefore property of the social organism, since it is the social structure itself to create and to accept their value by convention, then and only then we can understand how such a tax does not make sense to exist.
In other words, the power to issue money is not in the hands of the social organism, as it should be. It is in the hands of private citizens, who have been delegated such enormous power at the expense of the state and therefore the whole social organism. This is the crux of the problem. Taxation
so why? To support the social structure? Certainly. But equally: that is to cover expenses that the social structure can only meet if it emits the same money.
However, it is a historical fact that the taxes, it has never been fair, have never been sufficient to cover all public expenditure, since the state was then "forced" to borrow money by issuing bonds (bonds), and thus creating a debt that should not exist.
The ignorance of people born without ever becoming Catholic Christians allowed this to happen.
The social organism, having itself the necessary task of issuing money, it must do so without falling into debt to someone because this someone can not be held outside but within that body. So a social organism which issues borrowing money with itself would be merely an expression of stupidity. In fact it is the Creator, by law, money is therefore the rightful owner of the same coin.
So we must take back our currency.
To achieve this we need to stop depriving us of money, which by its nature, should only be given by the firm, and not be caught.
understand what money is a major step to liberate us from a distorted system of which we ourselves, as far as we are born and never become Catholic Christians, we are the architects.
therefore use common sense, a sense of proportion. We use epicheia Christian. Being without epicheia
practicing Catholics, it means once again be slaves, and ignorant.
According to the Evangelist Luke, the real reason for the crucifixion of Jesus was his preaching sull'epicheia. That is to say, as children of God we do not have tax obligations, but if the coin is the effigy of Caesar means that it is his, then dategliela.
In a democracy, however, Caesar is the people. What do we do?
therefore use common sense, a sense of proportion. We use epicheia Christian. Being without epicheia
practicing Catholics, it means once again be slaves, and ignorant.
According to the Evangelist Luke, the real reason for the crucifixion of Jesus was his preaching sull'epicheia. That is to say, as children of God we do not have tax obligations, but if the coin is the effigy of Caesar means that it is his, then dategliela.
In a democracy, however, Caesar is the people. What do we do?
For what is today's "bank seigniorage" ( *) if the right had Caesar? If Caesar
in democracy is the sovereign people, "giving to Caesar what is Caesar's" means giving the people what is the people. If they do not know the meaning of the words "Payable to bearer on demand", this is a sign of slavery, to the extent that dominates the abstract concrete. But the "sovereign citizen" can not be dominated. Otherwise what is sovereign?
-------------------------------
( *) The "seigniorage" is being granted BANKS CENTRAL (SpA Private for-profit, public institutions so far!) to issue paper money at the cost of printing and selling it on loan to the States, at full price (nominal value), burdened with interest. The amount of these loans is the Public Debt of each State, on which it continues to pay perpetual interest in infinite growth. The interest will be paid by citizens through taxation.
in democracy is the sovereign people, "giving to Caesar what is Caesar's" means giving the people what is the people. If they do not know the meaning of the words "Payable to bearer on demand", this is a sign of slavery, to the extent that dominates the abstract concrete. But the "sovereign citizen" can not be dominated. Otherwise what is sovereign?
-------------------------------
( *) The "seigniorage" is being granted BANKS CENTRAL (SpA Private for-profit, public institutions so far!) to issue paper money at the cost of printing and selling it on loan to the States, at full price (nominal value), burdened with interest. The amount of these loans is the Public Debt of each State, on which it continues to pay perpetual interest in infinite growth. The interest will be paid by citizens through taxation.
0 comments:
Post a Comment